Conservative same-brand baseline
Base support follows the trial’s saved markdown formula without another purchase. Optional enhanced renewal also needs qualified purchase value, as this example shows.
Work the caseAn illustrative enhanced renewal, from saved terms to reconciliation
Conservative same-brand baseline
Frozen before renewal results
At-risk recovery method
All commercial limits still apply
“The calculation can show what qualifies. It cannot prove Oplut caused the Order.”QUALIFICATION IS NOT CAUSATIONSee the calculation
In an enhanced renewal, qualified value tests the later purchase. Support then follows the saved share, old-position formula, participation, capacity, and caps. Base markdown support uses its own formula without this purchase test.
| The economic record | Qualified purchase value | Payable support |
|---|---|---|
| What it answers | How much fresh purchase value qualifies under the saved method? | How much old-stock support remains after every limit? |
| Starting record | Historical normal plus the current no-Oplut decision | Qualified value plus the justified old position |
| What reduces it | Historical ceiling and the minimum materiality hurdle | Participation, retained contribution, old-position formula, cap, and reconciliation |
| Calculation status | $480 qualifies under at-risk recovery | Pending. Required inputs must be reconciled. |
| What it does not prove | That Oplut caused the wholesale Order | That Flex is accepted, profitable, paid for, or repeatable |
Protection follows first-purchase eligibility. It does not require a hypothetical original basket.
The agreement selects above-normal contribution or documented at-risk recovery before results.
A newly protected line contributes no purchase value toward support for older stock.
Payment, fulfillment, Returns, credit, overlap, displacement, and final cost stay connected.
Select one method before results. Above-normal contribution measures value over the historical ceiling. At-risk recovery needs dated evidence of a reduced or withheld purchase. This illustrative case assumes eligible contribution, evidence, and displacement checks pass.
Eligible contribution $960Method fixed before a real attempt

A passing purchase-value result opens the enhanced-renewal calculation. Support still preserves retailer participation and the brand’s minimum contribution, and stays within the old-position formula and cap.
Base resolution follows its own saved formula, without requiring another wholesale purchase.
Payment, fulfillment, Returns, credit, Order splitting, overlap, displacement, prior accommodation, and incremental cost must reconcile before settlement.


Established products stay unprotected. Eligibility follows source history and saved trial scope, not a claim that Flex changed the basket.

The current counterfactual cannot be rewritten after paid demand or the fresh Order is known.
The cap bounds liability. It is never the amount automatically earned or paid.
No. After the saved minimum selling period, an eligible slow trial can use its agreed markdown plan. The retailer sets its own prices. Qualifying net sales, the saved support reference, retailer first loss, remaining capacity, and caps determine base Flex. A return fallback is available only if saved before purchase and reached after the markdown attempt.
No. It is qualified purchase value. Participation, retained contribution, the old-position formula, the absolute cap, and final reconciliation still determine payable support.
No. Qualification applies the saved agreement method. It does not establish causality.
They answer different questions: what this account normally buys and what this retailer would buy in this exact renewal without Flex.
No. A missing or unreliable baseline, counterfactual, cost, or retailer submission blocks the favorable result or routes it for review.
A failed, blocked, abandoned, expired, or zero-value enhanced attempt does not erase independently valid base protection. Both paths share one source capacity; the same value or support cannot be used twice.
Track trial adoption, initial order contribution, base-resolution cost, later ordinary reorders, enhanced-renewal economics, and total program cost separately. More trial products or a passing purchase test alone do not establish profitable growth.
Build 0 is still under review. Evidence standards, operating burden, viable commercial terms, operator acceptance, and repeatable economics remain to be established. The amounts here are illustrative, not Oplut defaults or merchant results.
Start with an eligible product trial and its saved base terms. Assess any optional renewal separately, then count support and operating costs across the whole program.
Review the mechanism and decide whether the transaction is worth testing with operators.
Book a conversationReview the transaction first